timothyhill:
…or I use one of the Fabonacci numbers (usually 89, 144, 233, 377, or 610). Either of those methods have been working really well for me. I sometimes wonder if 377 explains why a lot of those old analog delays sounded so good; that was close to the max delay available.
Hey timothyhill, would you explain what's the story behind Fabonacci numers? Thnx!
