Home › Forums › Products › Rackmount › Advanced Sampler Use – Question about Memory Scanning › Reply To: Advanced Sampler Use – Question about Memory Scanning
December 14, 2009 at 5:29 pm
#130767
tomylee
Participant
i think its the update rate, not the rate of change that makes problems with the start time input. The sknob surely has a different (lower) update rate as an lfo through an a-filtered-c module…cause that makes the sampler go <<Fill>> which is busy…
So is there a way to thin out that second lfo for changing the start time? Maybe a sample and hold would be the solution, I have to find a way now…
Cause in fact the knob works, just with dropouts, so maybe I just have to optimize on that behaviour a bit…