BPM Improvement in new beta software

This topic is empty.

Viewing 4 reply threads

Author

Posts
- October 5, 2009 at 8:51 pm #106499
  
  afullerton
  Participant
  
  The BPM reading on the new beta is now giving the correct reading. That is, 60 BPM is actually 60 BPM. I never took the time to figure out how "off" the reading was on the old version because I was usually at rehearsal and couldn't take the time. Can anyone tell me how inaccurate it was? I'm just curious. Thanks.
- October 5, 2009 at 9:10 pm #119170
  
  nickrose
  Moderator
  Eventide Staff
  
  Not sure if you are referring to MIDIclock, or the tap tempo settings.
  
  How does everyone find the new MIDIclock performance ? Hopefully it is now up to expectations.
- October 5, 2009 at 10:58 pm #119171
  
  afullerton
  Participant
  
  I'm asking about tap tempo.
- October 5, 2009 at 11:10 pm #130294
  
  nickrose
  Moderator
  Eventide Staff
  
  I'm not aware of any problems with tap tempo accuracy – I'll ask around.
- October 6, 2009 at 12:19 pm #130296
  
  afullerton
  Participant
  
  There was a thread some time back about this. I posted to it a time or two. My issue with it was that when we used a click track and I set the TF to the same BPM as the computer, they never matched. I always ended up having to tap it in. I can't remember for sure, but the TF may have been showing 2 BPM faster than the computer.
Author

Posts

Viewing 4 reply threads

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.