Latency in Some Algorithms

Home Forums Products Stompboxes Latency in Some Algorithms

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 8 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #113009

      Hi,

       

      I love what the EQ Comp adds to my tone on some of my patches, however, I noticed that using this algorithm introduces a noticeable (and annoying) lag.

      I haven’t noticed the other algorithms doing this and I hope that this is an isolated case because it gets in the way of the song.

       

      Would really appreciate your help.

       

       

      Regards,

       

      Ytolyccuz 

    • #141504
      workingtitle
      Participant
        The algorithm has 8.25 milliseconds latency. Thus it is not useful in real-time.

        Will there be an improvement? Maybe an option to disable lookahead in the compressor?

         

        • #142112
          gkellum
          Participant
            workingtitle wrote:

            Will there be an improvement? Maybe an option to disable lookahead in the compressor?

            Hey guys.  My colleague, Russ, who worked on this algorithm just had a baby and is out for paternity leave.  I'll ask him to take a look at this thread when he gets back.  

          • #142114
            wedelich
            Moderator
            Eventide Staff
              gkellum wrote:

              workingtitle wrote:

              Will there be an improvement? Maybe an option to disable lookahead in the compressor?

              Hey guys.  My colleague, Russ, who worked on this algorithm just had a baby and is out for paternity leave.  I'll ask him to take a look at this thread when he gets back.  

               

              Hi guys, 

               

              I actually picked up this algorithm from another guy who no longer works at Eventide.  I was reluctant to change it b/c he had to leave so close to its release.  The compressor(s) were implemented as look-ahead compressors, I think to deal with some transient handling and/or clipping issues.  I've never liked the latency either, I can take away the look ahead delays and see if it drastically changes the sound or causes undo clipping. Even so, it might be worth the trade-off.  What do you guys think? 

          • #142105
            workingtitle
            Participant

              I am surprised that it does not bother anyone. Is the latency maybe so bad on my device only? Is my H9 perhaps broken?

            • #142106

              I’m actually bothered… I was forced to compensate by adjusting my playing. Thankfully most of the patches have acceptable latency.

            • #142384
              wedelich
              Moderator
              Eventide Staff

                Ok, I removed the look ahead in the compressors for EQ Compressor to significantly reduce the latency.  This applies in the new SpaceTime release, H9 5.3.0[4].  Give it a try and let me know if it improves for you guys.  

              • #142391
                brock
                Participant

                  Not exactly a scientific assessment here, but the compressor is quite a bit snappier.  I didn’t try to measure latency, and the ‘combined’ compression parameters can make it difficult to compare & contrast.  But, hey … it plays well now.

                • #142396
                  workingtitle
                  Participant

                    It’s gotten a lot better in this release.

                  • #142429
                    tzvip
                    Participant

                      After I did the recent update I played with the EQ-Comprossor algo and then I thought: “am I imaginning or the latency is gone?”.

                      So obviously you did a good job! Thank you.

                    • #142431
                      wedelich
                      Moderator
                      Eventide Staff

                        No Problem!  I'm liking it better myself as well.  As a bass player, I usually try to play behind the beat a smidge, but I always felt the EQ Compressor was putting me too far back, and on further inspection, it totally was, so thanks for speaking up and bring it to our attention.  

                    Viewing 8 reply threads
                    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.