Wish list from users for future updates of the H90

[Plasmajet]

<span style=”font-size: inherit;”>Dear Eventide fans and Eventide stuff, the H90 is really an excellent effect device and I am very happy that I bought it. It is advertised as a guitar effect pedal, but it is so much more. I use it for example with synthesizers and as an outboard effect device for the DAW. I think there are many others who also use the H90 not only with a guitar.</span>

I don’t know exactly if there is already such a post here in the forum (I didn’t find any), but I thought that we Eventide users here might create a wish list for future updates. It would be nice if Eventide staff would stop by here from time to time and maybe comment on some of the ideas from users. If then wishes actually find their way into future updates, that would be great!

I’ll just start:

An autotune effect specifically for vocals

A vocoder with built-in carrier signal as well as the possibility to feed in the carrier.

A modern, natural reverb with many settings. Many of the effects integrated so far come from the H9, which is limited to 10 parameters.

Parameter expansion for some effects.

It would be great to have the possibility to integrate a third algorithm under the condition that you deactivate spillover.

For the Factor pedals and the H9 there is a separate area on the Eventide page where users can upload their presets. That would also be very fine for the H90!

Translated from KI because my English isnt very good.

[PRSGUY513]

Eventide Staff respond all the time. I would suggest looking at the H9000. It would meet your needs much better. Especially for vocal effects/enhancements. Of course you get to pay for that added functionality.😉

I’m not sure why there isn’t a separate choice for the H90 in the “product filter” section in the Preset Sharing area.

[tbskoglund]

Plasmajet wrote:

Dear Eventide fans and Eventide stuff, the H90 is really an excellent effect device and I am very happy that I bought it. It is advertised as a guitar effect pedal, but it is so much more. I use it for example with synthesizers and as an outboard effect device for the DAW. I think there are many others who also use the H90 not only with a guitar.</span> I don’t know exactly if there is already such a post here in the forum (I didn’t find any), but I thought that we Eventide users here might create a wish list for future updates. It would be nice if Eventide staff would stop by here from time to time and maybe comment on some of the ideas from users. If then wishes actually find their way into future updates, that would be great! I’ll just start: An autotune effect specifically for vocals A vocoder with built-in carrier signal as well as the possibility to feed in the carrier. A modern, natural reverb with many settings. Many of the effects integrated so far come from the H9, which is limited to 10 parameters. Parameter expansion for some effects. It would be great to have the possibility to integrate a third algorithm under the condition that you deactivate spillover. For the Factor pedals and the H9 there is a separate area on the Eventide page where users can upload their presets. That would also be very fine for the H90! Translated from KI because my English isnt very good.

Thanks for your suggestions! We do consider new features and algorithm ideas from users who post here, so feel free to comment with any other ideas you have.

Have you experimented with SP2016 Reverb? This can certainly be a modern and natural reverb. If that doesn’t suit you, can you be more specific with what you are looking for?

Can you elaborate on “Parameter expansion for some effects”? We did add parameters to some of the H9 algorithms, are you requesting more of these? Any algorithms/parameters in particular?

I can log the rest of the requests you have made.

[Plasmajet]

Thank you for your answer! It is really nice that suggestions from Eventide Stuff are answered here! Unfortunately, this is not a matter of course for many companies, so I am all the more pleased that Eventide maintains a good user relationship here!

As an example of a parameter extension, Diatonic or Quardavox could be mentioned. An option to distribute the additional voices individually in the panorama would be nice. Maybe also a downstream equalizer.

For the reverb algorithms, it would be good if you could choose between early reflections and reverb for each one.

Yes, I know that the SP2016 is popular with many people. I myself find the reverb quite unnatural. It’s probably also a matter of taste. But having an alternative would be good. So far Modechoreverb is my favorite reverb.

[nelstruesdell]

Randomizer in the H90 App. With a few different options such as randomize all – also include options for less dramatic results. For example just randomize parameters on Preset A and ignore B.

[rdnzl]

Expose the send / return / Mix values to the quick knobs.

[fiddlercrabseason]

Please separate the looper ‘record/dub speed’ and ‘playback speed’.

[fiddlercrabseason]

And snap the looper’s resolution back to the preset saved posiiton (eg, smooth, chromatic, etc) after initial recording has ended.

[Infection]

I would love to see new analog modeled filter and wah algorithms.

I think the old ones are a bit lacking in soundquality (especially with high resonance), and the controls are a bit confusing and limited due to the multiple functions per knob.

Separate resonance and frequency knobs makes much more sense to me than the intensity knob on the modfilter algorithm.

I am also wondering if it is a possibility to use the SIFT technology to pitchtrack parameters like cutoff frequency and resonance.

Pitchtracked resonator with 6 voices?

 

 

 

[Infection]

And here are some other ideas I have been thinking about:

 

-Some more subtle synth algorithms in the vein of Electro Harmonix .9 series and the ensemble mode on Strymon Cloudburst.

-Another BBD delay, where each succesive repeat is further degraded and with a more conventional feedback parameter that can go into selfoscillation instead of separating number of repeats and selfoscillation.

– New modulation algorithms building on the Head Space and Bouqet Delay.

-A tape saturation with tape flanging/doubling/wow&flutter algorithm.

-Even though the Rotary algorithm is pretty good and loved by people like Josh Smith I think it could be improved upon

-A wavefolder, possibly even a wavetable based wavefolder with sequencer/lfo/dynamcis control for the wavetable morphing (would be great for bass and synths)

-An updated band delay with more delay lines and analog modeled filters with more options for tweaking individual bands.

-Granular effects/micro looping/Glitch effects (think Hologram Microcosm/Chase bliss)

-A Über delay with diffusion, phasing/chorus/flanging, pitchshift, Lo-fi, tape/bbd/digital, and saturation. parallell paths with different effects?

-A Channel strip suited for vocals with EQ, compressor, saturation, delay and reverb.

-A guitar one stop multialgorithm with a dumbed down weedwacker, tremolo/harmonic trem, bbd/tape echo and spring/plate reverb.

 

 

 

 

[tbskoglund]

Thanks all for your suggestions, we’re taking notes!

[IronStomach]

Just wanted to echo the requests for a granular delay/micro looper & more synthesizer options! I feel like the H90’s pitch tracking and processing power would work really well for those.

[ndeshpande]

Plasmajet wrote:

For the reverb algorithms, it would be good if you could choose between early reflections and reverb for each one.

Yes, I know that the SP2016 is popular with many people. I myself find the reverb quite unnatural. It’s probably also a matter of taste. But having an alternative would be good. So far Modechoreverb is my favorite reverb.

SP2016 can be very flexible but when I first used it I found a small learning curve, patience, and a careful ear were required to dial in the algorithm to get what I wanted. Everyone’s tastes are different, but my general intuitions are that as as Position goes up Diffusion goes slightly down, and as Decay goes up Position needs to go up as well. Don’t be afraid to crank the low and high filters to more extreme values for frequency and gain than you’d think you need to, especially for larger decays – they can keep the signal from getting too muddy or sibilant, and the high filter in particular is important for dialing in that top end (often referred to as “air” or “brilliance” by producers). The algorithm can be strong, I find getting a natural setting requires a pre-delay of at least 15-20 ms. I really like the stereo room algorithm, but if you’re in mono vintage plate and vintage stereo can sound warm and sweet.

As you say, reverb is very much so a matter of taste. One person’s natural is another’s tinny or sparse. I have been getting lots of mileage out of Blackhole recently, set for a more classic 80s style reverb rather than the galactic-sized tones it is more commonly used for – Mix below 25, Gravity between 1 and 10, Size around 50, Pre Delay between 15 and 40 ms, Mod Depth around 30, Mod Rate around 40, Feedback set below 15, Resonance around 40, Low and High to taste (almost always cutting both of them; my ear tends to prefer Low around -25 and High around -45). Backing Size off to around 30 and increasing the Mod Depth a little higher can be used for an even smaller space with a lovely bloom to its attack, and setting Gravity between -10 and -5 then setting Feedback to 0 can also get a wonderfully lush attack that lets your tone float over a short but very sweet and dense tail.

Do you have a preferred patch or general settings of Modechoverb that you enjoy? That would give us some idea of what you think is “natural” and we can guide you to some presets from there.

Can you also clarify what you mean by “choosing between early reflections and reverb”? In algorithms that contain them, Early Reflections are part of the Reverb, not a separate thing – perhaps you mean being able to dial in both early and late reflections independently? Reverb development is more dark art than pure science, and over the years many terms have gotten cross-wired. Some of our algorithms – including SP2016 and ModEchoVerb – offer you some level of control over early reflections, but I want to make sure we’re talking about the same thing before giving you a few pointers there. Another option is to use MicroPitch, H910/H949, or HeadSpace to generate more concrete reflections, then use that to feed a bigger reverb algorithm with increased pre delay so the early reflections have time to stand on their own before the bigger late reverb tail kicks in.

[brock]

Wish List aside for the moment (I concur with most of the above), I always enjoy the insight found in your rare posts, @ndeshpande.

RE:early / late reflections – I just wanted to point out the depth to be found in the more ‘boring’ algorithms (Room, but Hall is deep, as well).  And – not unlike BlackHole – there are plenty of ways to tame the ‘sexier’ offerings, like Wormhole.

[brock]

Back on topic:  We can set aside the control exotica mentioned earlier in similar threads (assignable LFOs, envelopes / followers, step sequencers …)

Let’s start fairly simply:  An A/B Performance Parameter, triggered by (any) footswitch, controlling the current EXP pedal(s) mapping, or even to the [P] [A] HotKnob assignments..  Momentary / toggle / latching (H-T; T-H).  Wide range, variable rise / fall times a must.  Bonus points for EXP / LIN / LOG curves.

[captaincarotte]

A few ideas :

– I’d love to have an extra option for the SPRING algo, where we could generate a “pop” similar to the reverb tanks of yore you could kick. It could be a simple “noise” that would excite the reverb and make that characteristic booming wet sound.

– An extra option for the FLANGER and / or the INSTANT FLANGER to self oscillate à la A/DA or Boss BF1. I haven’t found a way to do it with the current state of the algos, maybe I haven’t given them a proper go though.

– A new modulation with the option to control the shape of the LFO and control it in different ways : to have a square “ascent” and a “seesaw” descent for example, or any other combination. This could be implemented as extra parameters for the new INSTANT PHASER / FLANGER.

– a stutter / bitcrusher algo, with tons of parameters to deliciously destroy our carefully crafted tones.

– I too would love a voice / choir generator !

[Plasmajet]

<p style=”text-align: left;”>SP2016 can be very flexible but when I first used it I found a small learning curve, patience, and a careful ear were required to dial in the algorithm to get what I wanted. Everyone’s tastes are different, but my general intuitions are that as as Position goes up Diffusion goes slightly down, and as Decay goes up Position needs to go up as well. Don’t be afraid to crank the low and high filters to more extreme values for frequency and gain than you’d think you need to, especially for larger decays – they can keep the signal from getting too muddy or sibilant, and the high filter in particular is important for dialing in that top end (often referred to as “air” or “brilliance” by producers). The algorithm can be strong, I find getting a natural setting requires a pre-delay of at least 15-20 ms. I really like the stereo room algorithm, but if you’re in mono vintage plate and vintage stereo can sound warm and sweet.</p>

Thank you very much for the explanations and assistance! I will give the SP2016 reverb another chance and experiment a bit.

Yes, exactly, I mean the possibility to dial in both early and late reflections independently. Sorry, maybe something went wrong in the translation into English. I would also find it good if you could directly and separately influence the early reflections in algorithms like Hall and Dualverb.

I can’t exactly describe why I like the ModEchoVerb best so far. I find the early reflections very nice and how they change with the size of the room. But here too, a detailed setting option would be advantageous. At least that you can adjust the volume of the early reflections.

I have also thought about using a pre-delay. However, you also „waste“ an algorithm with that.

[Plasmajet]

Pre-Delay   …using a Delay before the reverb.

[teabandito]

Please import the Dynamic Distortion 2 algorithm from Eclipse unit or create a similar algo with natural feedback emulation. It sounds much more natural than any other feedbacker and brings life to modelers/profilers amp emulation.

[ndeshpande]

Plasmajet wrote:

 Thank you very much for the explanations and assistance! I will give the SP2016 reverb another chance and experiment a bit. Yes, exactly, I mean the possibility to dial in both early and late reflections independently. Sorry, maybe something went wrong in the translation into English. I would also find it good if you could directly and separately influence the early reflections in algorithms like Hall and Dualverb. I can’t exactly describe why I like the ModEchoVerb best so far. I find the early reflections very nice and how they change with the size of the room. But here too, a detailed setting option would be advantageous. At least that you can adjust the volume of the early reflections. I have also thought about using a pre-delay. However, you also „waste“ an algorithm with that.

Of course, happy to help out. Enjoy your sonic exploration, and remember that it’s half the fun of finally getting to your new favorite tones. As one of my favorite Rush tunes says – the point of a journey is not to arrive.

It’s not an English translation thing, it’s that so many of the parameter terms around reverb are slightly in conflict with the same terminology from room acoustics and signal processing so it’s just a matter of us talking through things to make sure we mean the same thing, so I can better help you out.

Reverb algorithms can be tricky beasts, a lot of the time reverb designers will tune both early and late reflections VERY carefully because it’s easy to shoot yourself in the foot and get something that sounds much much too buzzy and resonant, or going in the other direction it can sound too sparse and not very realistic. All reflections in the algorithm are a tap dance of getting each delay time carefully constructed in relation to all others. This to say, I don’t want you to end up with an algorithm that is difficult to tune and get sounding smooth/musical, as getting that balance and blend right is complicated and a lot of careful work.

Definitely spend more time with SP2016, I think once you wrap your head around how the parameters are linked you will get a LOT more mileage out of it. And sure it requires two algorithms to run an early reflections and full reverb algorithm, but I think you’ll be surprised at just how many classes of sounds you can get with that potent pairing.

A few additional notes, off the top of my head:

• You don’t need a lot of delays and feedback in an early reflection algorithm. In room acoustics, the larger concert halls tend to have a late field kick in by about 75 ms at the latest, though that tends to be for bigger concert halls measuring unamplified (“classical”) ensembles like string quartets and orchestras.
  • Hence, I really think you can get a lot of mileage out of MicroPitch or Headspace for this task. A common trick is to start with Fibonacci numbers, keeping in mind you want the echoes (with feedback) to decay by the 50ish ms mark for a 2 second decay.
• UltraTap – I don’t know why I didn’t think of this one yesterday. It will work wonderfully as an Early Reflections machine.
• It seems like an odd beast for this task, but Blackhole is actually pretty good for early reflections. Small Size from 0-20, Inverse Gravity values closer to -30 to -50, low feedback, keep Mod Depth low (maybe around 5 or 10?). No pre delay, Feedback set to 10 or lower. I recommend you back the Low value off too, to prevent the reflections from turning in to mud.
• Dual verb can also work well, if you tune one algorithm to be pretty short and another to be much longer. Tune the first reverb so it’s a slight puff or bloom of attack, then the second reverb so it’s your long late and smooth decay.

[udi9]

Now that I’ve had the H90 for a while, I find that all of the feature requests I had in mind fall in the “nice to have” category. The only thing I find missing is the ability to name HotSwitches. Having multiple lists and programs for different setups, it’s sometimes hard to remember what each HS is programmed to do. I currently have a Google Sheets spreadsheet on my phone with all of the HS functions, but having an option to see it directly on the pedal would be great.

[ernestorossi]

I know it’s already in the wishlist but I’ll really like to have an app for smartphone/tablet as soon as possible.

The back panel is crowded, what about if inserts for jacks were more spaced from each other?

I find that plugging a simple tap tempo pedal to set the time based effects is quite complicated, I’ll like to have an easier straigh-forward function for it in the global functions page.

Thank’s for your attention.

[tbskoglund]

There is a global option for tap tempo. This will make the controller always adjust the System Tempo BPM. You just need to turn Tempo Sync on for whatever preset you want to sync to this and then it will automatically follow the tempo.

https://cdn.eventideaudio.com/manuals/h90/1.5.2/content/tempo-menu.html

[Plasmajet]

Of course, happy to help out. Enjoy your sonic exploration, and remember that it’s half the fun of finally getting to your new favorite tones. As one of my favorite Rush tunes says – the point of a journey is not to arrive.

Thank you again for your explanations!

I will try some of the tips you suggested in the near future.

Do you have any general tips for my favorite reverb ModEchoVerb? Also a question: Flanger and chorus are clear, but what exactly does the swept modulation do?

But now back to the actual topic Whish List:

While many of my wishes so far fall more into the nice-to-have category, as another user has already put it, there are two things that I really miss and that would make working with the H90 much easier:

.) An option to set In/ Out Gain globally for all programs.

.) The second, if not even bigger wish would be to see the input level, the output level and also the volume of the individual effects after signal processing with simple level meters and/ or numerical values. I know that the H90 has a clipping indicator at the input, but it does not tell you whether the audio signal is overdriven after signal processing.

You can rely on your hearing, of course, but easier and more practical in many situations would be a visual feedback.

I mainly use the H90 in conjunction with a DAW. Therefore, it is especially important for me to have this feature in the H90 Control App (that’s why I mentioned it in the Whish List Control App) but I think it wouldn’t be wrong to have the option on the device itself as well.

[keir]

I would like the option to set the H90 for stereo or dual mono / or the ability to switch off an output to have just mono only

I usually run my pedalboard in mono, if I want to use it in stereo my H90 needs to be on the back row to allow me to plug into the second output.

I would like to have it permanently wired in stereo but a global setting to choose that only one output is used when needed.

Thanks

[daniel_brewer]

I’m new to Eventide, having purchased and received an H90 a few weeks ago. This would be a minor request, but I’d like to be able to rename the user lists instead of calling them 1,2,3, and 4. Maybe this is possible and I just don’t know how to do it. I’ve tried right clicking and looking at the menu in the upper left, but haven’t found a way to do it. I’m loving the unit and realize that it is capable of way more than I’m getting out of it currently.

I find the explanation in the manual for Hot Switches to be lacking a bit. Are there any good in depth tutorials available? As an example, I’m trying to program hot switch 1 for the weedwacker to turn on the Stage 2 drive. When I’ve managed to program that, the pedal also changes the mix from 51 to 100 (which is not what I intend) while turning on the stage 2 drive. I haven’t seen any excellent tutorials on Hot Switches on YouTube or the Eventide Website.

Lastly I know that in depth user manuals aren’t sexy, but with a unit this powerful and complex, I think adding more in depth or detailed video tutorials would be a big plus. I’ve used HX Stomps, Kempers, and other multi effects pedals, and am familiar with programming midi functionality, but this has been the hardest pedal for me to wrap my head around. Thank you!

[tbskoglund]

You can rename lists by clicking the pencil icon in the bottom left corner of H90 Control. It is not possible to rename lists using just the pedal.

It sounds like you also have the mix control mapped to the HotSwitch. You can use the Select knob to scroll through all of the parameters while you are mapping a HotSwitch, then press a Quick Knob to map or unmap the parameter to the HotSwitch. Using H90 Control also makes it a bit easier to see all the parameters that are mapped to a HotSwitch in one place.

We’re working on some video tutorials, thanks for your patience. Let me know if there is anything else I can help with in the meantime.

 

[daniel_brewer]

Thank You! I’m beginning to understand the H90 control app now. I love that the Eventide staff engages with their users. Kudos to you! This one powerful pedal is definitely saving me some space on my pedal board. Can’t wait to see what I can do with this pedal once I really get my head around this little powerhouse!

 

[Ehmsi]

Maybe someone has already asked for this, but then let me emphasize this. Otherwise here is a very important request:

Not being able to create a preset with two individual algorithms on a $1200 hardware is a mystery to me.

Why can’t I just simply select two algorithms and create a preset with them?

Why do I have to choose a preset hopefully containing them both.

And what if I would like to create a preset with two algorithms of the same type? Let’s say two distortions.

This is currently not possible. Could you make this possible, please?

 

[brock]

You may be mistaking how the hierarchy is laid out in the H90::

• You can select any two algorithms (Presets) to create a a new Program.
• It doesn’t necessarily have to be done in an existing Program (but it can be).
• Any Program can be a combination of two different Presets, or two of the same algorithm / Preset.

[tbskoglund]

The above information is correct. The easiest way to create a new Program from a blank slate would be to load the User 2 list which is full of INIT Programs (blank programs), and then press the Presets button on the H90 to select a new Preset for Slot A or B.

https://cdn.eventideaudio.com/manuals/h90/1.5.2/content/edit-modes/presets.html

[PEIPUNK]

Gotta say – the software should be better at this ostensibly simple task.

The current copy/paste method is a bit janky.

Algos should be drag & droppable – or at least browsable independent of the Program list.

Also re-upping a Software Manual request. It’s not intuitive enough to be PDF-less. For instance, I just pressed enter after naming a file in the H90 software and it erased all my parameter changes.

[tbskoglund]

You can go to the Preset Library menu to browse the different algorithms and their presets. They cannot be drag and dropped.

If you can repro the issue you had with renaming/saving in H90 Control, please start a new forum post with more details and we can look into the issue.

 

[Ehmsi]

As far as I have understood (and I have also found no other way), I can only SEARCH for a preset that already contains the two algorithms that I would like to have.
Okay, let’s say I would like to create a preset containing the WeedWacker and the Sculpt algorithm.

How would I do this?

[Ehmsi]

Okay, not that you get me wrong. I would like to freely combine two algorithms in one preset. Not two presets, A and B.
Maybe I would like to add another preset with two freely chosen algorithms like the Chorus and the RingMod for example in the B slot.

How is this possible?

[tbskoglund]

Correct, that is not possible.

A Program is a combination of Preset A and B. You can use a combination of Chorus and RingMod as a Program, but you cannot combine them to be a single Preset.

Many of the algorithms can be used for multiple effects (ModEchoVerb, SpaceTime, etc.) so you can achieve more than 1 effect type using a single Preset.

If you follow my instructions from the last response, you can create a Program that uses a Sculpt Presets and a Weedwacker Preset.

[daniel_brewer]

Another very minor wish list item: having another option for the tuner that gives a left-center-right visual rather than just cents. I’m still new to this unit so it may be there and I just haven’t seen it. Also, it would be nice to have this available in performance mode.

[PEIPUNK]

Thanks for even entertaining suggestions!

May I go to bat for PAN CONTROL! Even if just for the phasers.

The best part of a Bi-phase is two slow phasers sweeping in stereo parallel at slightly different rates.

If they could do it in the Seventies, we should be able to do it fifty years later.

[PEIPUNK]

Also – if the User 1 list is uneditable, rename it Factory

It’ll spare us noobs some grief

[tbskoglund]

To clarify, the User 1 list can be edited. It is simply a copy of the Factory 1 list, which cannot be edited.

This allows you to go back and recall Factory Programs using the Programs Edit mode and selecting the Factory 1 list if you overwrite them on the User 1 list.

[brock]

PEIPUNK wrote:

… May I go to bat for PAN CONTROL! Even if just for the phasers. The best part of a Bi-phase is two slow phasers sweeping in stereo parallel at slightly different rates …

I’m with you on the Pan control; probably at the Program level with Parallel routings.  In Series, you can pull off Balance-type.control.

I just wanted to add that you can currently pull off that Phaser trick.  I just uploaded something virtually identical, except with 2 Chorus instances in parallel.

It’s a little more work, but I’ve gone down the rabbit hole lately, using the (P)rogram HotKnob as a blender between parallel effects.  Simple, but versatile.

[daniel_brewer]

I think you guys have done a great job on the Weedwacker and Fuzz algorithms. Maybe some additional drives could be added similar to a Nobel’s Overdrive, Timmy, KOT, Klon, and the other usual suspects. I would second the copy/paste comment above. It would be nice to just drag and drop an algorithm into a program, whether creating from scratch or editing.

[Infection]

PEIPUNK wrote:

May I go to bat for PAN CONTROL! .

Pan would be great! I don’t know if it would be best at program or algorithm level, but definetely +1 on this.

[keir]

Another suggestion from me:

Could a CC parameter be assigned to control expression pedal sweep from an external controller?
<span style=”font-size: inherit;”>
I have a Morningstar midi controller and if I attach an expression pedal to that, I can only control one ‘knob’ on the H90 via expression over midi, as opposed to morphing between 2 different sounds if attached to the H90 itself.</span>

Thanks

 

[tbskoglund]

I’m sorry, I don’t understand the request. Whether you are connecting an expression pedal or MIDI controller to the H90, the mapping capabilities are the same.

How is your H90 configured when you are morphing between 2 different sounds using the expression pedal? You should be able to achieve that same control using MIDI control from the Morningstar.

[apalazzolo]

The P, A, and B hotknobs can be used for multi parameter morphing.  I think the H90 exp ped does this too but I don’t use it.

Direct your Morningstar expression pedal to one of those and keep it that way.  I use P hotknob.

In the H90 you assign any number of parameters per program/preset to whichever one of those hotknobs you linked to your Morningstar exp ped.

Done.

Your morningstar exp ped will do whatever hotknob morphing you build into each H90 program/preset.

 

[ernestorossi]

Dear tbskoglund, I tryied to catch your suggestion…

__________________________________________________________________

“There is a global option for tap tempo. This will make the controller always adjust the System Tempo BPM. You just need to turn Tempo Sync on for whatever preset you want to sync to this and then it will automatically follow the tempo.

https://cdn.eventideaudio.com/manuals/h90/1.5.2/content/tempo-menu.html&#8221;

___________________________________________________________________

…but it seems it’s not working, I mean it’s me for sure. I’m new to Eventide echosystem and I’m struggling to catch the way things must be done.

I’ll try to explain what’s happening here: I have a budget tap tempo footswitch (the kind of a sustain pedal for keyboards), I imagined out I could stick it in the exp/ctl jack and simply tap it to set the tempo of a program (as I usually ever done previously with my devices). I thought it just needed to enable the H90 to do it, but seems things are a lot more complicated than that.I also think maybe it’s not possible to do the thing because of the tap pedal itself, which has to be a midi controller instead.

Don’t know if I’m totaly wrong. Anyway I’ll like to know the procedure for enabling a tap tempo fs, whathever it is,  by an external footswitch right from the scratch, and probably to get which is the right tap fs to use if there is any.

By the way. that’s why I asked for a more straight forward solution in my wishlist…

Thank you a lot!!!

 

[tbskoglund]

You’re welcome.

First, go to System Settings > I/O and set Pedal 1 to “SW 1-3”, then go to calibration to confirm the aux switch works correctly.

https://cdn.eventideaudio.com/manuals/h90/1.5.2/content/system-menu/io.html

Now, go to Global – Pedal Ctl and set Tap Tempo to SW 1.

https://cdn.eventideaudio.com/manuals/h90/1.5.2/content/system-menu/global.html

You should now be able to control the System Tempo using the aux switch. Follow the instructions to turn tempo sync on for Preset A or B, and your effects will sync to the System Tempo.

https://cdn.eventideaudio.com/manuals/h90/1.5.2/content/tempo-menu.html

 

[ernestorossi]

Dear tbskoglund, I succeeded! Thanks a lot, it wasn’t easy to get there at first.

Love you guys!

[tbskoglund]

Good to hear!

[PRSGUY513]

Is there a way to stop getting notifications/emails (unfollow) for specific threads on this forum?

Thanks for any help?

Sorry I found it!

[tbskoglund]

Yes, scroll to the top of the thread and click the “Unsubscribe” button.

[PRSGUY513]

Thanks! Sometimes I’m blind.😉

[benevan]

Oil Can Delay

H9 Oil Can Delay Settings?

User Brock made a faux/not quite accurate oil can delay from the Mod Delay algorithm for the H9 several years ago but I think it deserves its own dedicated algorithm on the H90.

+1 for a Feedback algorithm. Dynamic Distortion 2 would be fine but I am also good with a more “effecty” algorithm in he vein of the Freqout.

[keir]

Not sure how this would work but a really basic looper mode would be great.

Something similar to the timeline / lvx / echosystem, that can be turned on at any time in addition to the program that is loaded and without using up a preset slot, no parameters would really be needed just play / rec / stop / undo

<span style=”font-size: inherit;”> </span>

[fiddlercrabseason]

…the ability to put insert 2 *before* insert 1 (without re-wiring patch cables).

[fiddlercrabseason]

…the ability to tempo sync modulation rates.

[teabandito]

Is it possible to add some shortcuts in H90 Control? At least Ctrl Z to undo the last change, space to bypass selected preset etc? It works in Line 6 HX Edit and it would be extremely comfortable if it worked in H90 Control too.

[LagPhil]

Hello,
I would like to know if it was possible to create a graphic or parametric equalizer to insert it into the loop of my guitar amp in the futur update ?

Thank you very in advance.

[fiddlercrabseason]

fiddlercrabseason wrote:

…the ability to put insert 2 *before* insert 1 (without re-wiring patch cables).

 

…another instance where I’d like to be able to have insert 2 before insert 1…

 

[mishik]

global lfo and envelope follower

to modulate any fx parameters

[milesspilsbury]

hey eventide

 

it would be great if the harmoniser algorithims had a pentatonic scale option! Could this please be included in the next update

Minor pentatonic or major pentatonic, either would work, both options would be ideal.

 

This would really widen the application of the harmoniser stuff.

[cestlamort]

I’d welcome an option to make the tuner display larger.

for new algorithms, I’d love a granular delay

[eturnian]

I’m using the H90 on guitar and vocals and it’s amazing!

I would really love a pitch shifter with modern formant control, (and perhaps some subtle adjustable pitch correction.) something better than Roland’s VT-3, as in high fidelity modern independent formant and pitch control.

I’d also love a vocoder!

And / Or a vocoding pitch shifter (like that receives chords via midi or audio and just shifts my voice to the keyboard or guitar voicing. A mix control would also be very helpful with this effect)

A high fidelity “real time” granular time stretcher

[Anthony]

Not a new request but adding it here: The ability to continuously control the global volume across all programmes by expression pedal (midi preferably) without the programme defaulting to the preset volume. The H9 had this capability but was lost on when implementing on the H90.

[fiddlercrabseason]

I would love to be able to sweep the position of both inserts with exp pedal, CV or MIDI. Ideally with some control over crossfading.

[honeybrew]

• I also vote for the request mentioning natural reverb above. I don’t like results I get with h90, “digital” sound is too apparent.
• However this might be due to the nature (frequencies) of my instrument (saxophone), so my ask would be actually add more source types to the h90 (currently there are I think Guitar, Bass guitar, Lead, and Sub ). Maybe add woodwinds, brass, vocal source types would make difference?
• I have also noticed that there is problem with sound levels for different algorithms, in the way it overloads amplification in one algo but it is ok for other. Again I’m not sure if for guitars the same problem exists, but with saxophone there is need to spend hours to level those algorithms properly.

[ndeshpande]

honeybrew wrote:

• I also vote for the request mentioning natural reverb above. I don’t like results I get with h90, “digital” sound is too apparent.
• However this might be due to the nature (frequencies) of my instrument (saxophone), so my ask would be actually add more source types to the h90 (currently there are I think Guitar, Bass guitar, Lead, and Sub ). Maybe add woodwinds, brass, vocal source types would make difference?
• I have also noticed that there is problem with sound levels for different algorithms, in the way it overloads amplification in one algo but it is ok for other. Again I’m not sure if for guitars the same problem exists, but with saxophone there is need to spend hours to level those algorithms properly.

In addition to everything I’ve said in this thread, make sure you’re using larger sizes in your reverbs. Reduce decay or feedback controls to help compensate for the increased decay time from larger reverb sizes.

[RomanCromov]

I use my Strymon Iridium as a stereo insert for H90 and my guitar goes into input 1. So I can ran algos in front of the Iridium or after how ever I like. Super cool. But I need the insert to be always ON while I list programs.

• I think you should keep the insert state for all programs as a global setting. Let it stay as it is (on or off) at least somewhere on a chain even if the routing is changing from the parallel to the serial and wise versa.
• And I should be able to choose somehow in the settings will the insert will be muted when I turn the program off or not.

[eturnian]

I would also love to be able to alter the colors of all the LEDs. (Buttons and knob lights) Like the way we can swap skins in ableton. Colors tend to really affect how inspired I feel about a pedal. The pedal sounds so amazing, and it would be even cooler if  we had pinks, purples, turqoise, sea foam, and others. The red and green lights evoke a Christmas vibe which doesn’t always appeal to my mood. Like maybe we can just choose the color of each light in deferent modes, like with a continuous hue cycler on a knob, in the preferences section, or if that seems like too much, then even a few different options, like a dark mode of blues and purples, a surf mode with pinks and aquas, and maybe vintage mode of warm ambers and sapphires. some color options beyond Christmas mode 🙂

[NoneMoreBlack]

Two things.

1. <span style=”font-size: inherit;”>A chorus that works along the same principles as the Roland Dimension D / Boss DC-2w, but more tweakable. </span>
2. A feedback generating effect along the lines of the Digitech Freqout, and if you’re doing that a feedback eliminating algorithm would be good as well.

 

 

[NoneMoreBlack]

milesspilsbury wrote:

hey eventide it would be great if the harmoniser algorithims had a pentatonic scale option! Could this please be included in the next update Minor pentatonic or major pentatonic, either would work, both options would be ideal. This would really widen the application of the harmoniser stuff.

add Harmonic Minor to this too please

[Author]

Posts